Qualis/CAPES  B4 (2017-2020) Google Scholar   Citations: 927   |   h‑index: 13   |   i10‑index: 25   |   h5‑index: 60   |   h5‑median: 8.5 Impact Factor  SJIF: 3.138 (2021)
Clinical utility of Point-of-Care D-dimer assay analyzers to exclude pulmonary thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF

Keywords

Blood Clotting Disorders
Blood Clotting Tests
Pulmonary Embolism
Enzyme Immunoadsorption Tests
Point-of-Care Tests
Coronavirus Infection

How to Cite

1.
Lyra Silva RC, Vasconcelos de Souza I, de Freitas Peregrino AA, Maia Pessanha C, Barbosa Meireles I, Lyra da Silva CR. Clinical utility of Point-of-Care D-dimer assay analyzers to exclude pulmonary thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19. Glob Acad Nurs [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];1(3):e58. Available from: https://globalacademicnursing.com/index.php/globacadnurs/article/view/99

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of D-dimer POC assay analyzers to rule out the diagnosis of PTE in adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Systematic review and meta-analysis. The evaluated technology was the Point-of-Care D-dimer assay analyzer. To combine the effect estimates whose measure was the difference between the means, the random effect model was used. We included 10 studies that evaluated 14 Point-of-Care analyzers compared to the Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay assay. All Point-of-Care analyzers evaluated showed sensitivity and NPV greater than 95 and 97%, respectively, with an average return time of 95 minutes. Evidence suggests that the use of Point-of-Care analyzers for D-dimer is clinically useful to rule out cases of pulmonary thromboembolism and other thromboembolic complications in patients with COVID-19 treated in the emergency room or in primary care units.

https://doi.org/10.5935/2675-5602.20200058
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.