Qualis/CAPES  B4 (2017-2020) Google Scholar   Citations: 927   |   h‑index: 13   |   i10‑index: 25   |   h5‑index: 60   |   h5‑median: 8.5 Impact Factor  SJIF: 3.138 (2021)
Clinical screening and donation experience from the blood donor's perspective
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF

Keywords

Blood Donors
Donor Selection
Serological Tests
Communicable Diseases
Risk Factors

How to Cite

1.
Said Lima Costa L, de Araujo Eleuterio T, de Almeida Menezes R, Bernardes da Conceição MM, da Silva Pereira S, Miranda Gomes de Constantino Bandeira F. Clinical screening and donation experience from the blood donor’s perspective. Glob Acad Nurs [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];1(3):e38. Available from: https://globalacademicnursing.com/index.php/globacadnurs/article/view/39

Abstract

The aim was to describe the experience of donation and clinical screening from the donor's perspective. This is a cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study, with non-probabilistic sampling, between November 2018 and March 2020. The scenario was a hemotherapy service in Rio de Janeiro. A self-administered questionnaire with 32 questions was used for blood donation candidates. Univariate and bivariate analyzes were performed, a chi-square test was applied, considering a significance level of 5%, using IBM's SPSS software. Of the 400 respondents, 54.8% were donating spontaneously; 71.5% declared to be repeat donors; 36% reported having an interest in the results of serological tests; 88.3% admitted to fully trusting the results of such exams; 65.8% declared they had no knowledge about the health units where they could be carried out; and 59.8% considered transmission of infections possible through transfusion. About repeat donors; 66.4% reported having been asked about vulnerabilities and risk situations in clinical screening; for 38.8%, the opportunity for self-exclusion was not clear. In this context, the nurse has a role both in approaching the donor in clinical screening, as well as in explaining the donation process, to allow conscious decision-making by self-exclusion, based on adequate guidance regarding their vulnerability.

https://doi.org/10.5935/2675-5602.20200038
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.