Keywords
Personal Autonomy
Digital Technology
Patient Safety
Professional-Patient Relations
How to Cite
Abstract
The digitalization of healthcare, while promising greater efficiency and personalization, introduces profound ethical tensions by operating under algorithmic logics that can subvert traditional bioethical principles. This theoretical reflection study aimed to analyze, considering critical bioethics and the philosophy of technology, how the architectures of digital platforms erode the principle of autonomy and challenge the care relationship in healthcare. Through an integrative critical literature review of the Medline, SciELO, and Google Scholar databases, it is argued that this erosion occurs in three interconnected dimensions: the redefinition of autonomy as algorithmic compatibility, the transformation of the therapeutic relationship by engagement metrics unrelated to care, and the colonization of the clinical space by the rationality of dataism. It concludes that this is a structural conflict (mismatch) between the relational ethics of clinical care and the instrumental ethics of platforms, requiring, as a response, a resilient ethical praxis in the field of health, based on critical literacy, advocacy for transparency, and the development of alternative technologies centered on the therapeutic values of the bond and patient safety.
References
Topol EJ. Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. New York: Basic Books; 2019.
Mathews SC, McShea MJ, Hanley CL, Ravitz A, Labrique AB, Cohen AB. Digital health: a path to validation. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:38. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0111-3.
Zuboff S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs; 2019.
Van Dijck J, Poell T, de Waal M. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018.
Machado KRS, Pereira MEBC, Carvalho DQ, Rocha RSB. Fontes de informação em saúde utilizadas pela população brasileira: uma revisão integrativa. Cienc Saude Colet. 2021;26(11):5745-5758. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320212611.32102020.
Centro Regional de Estudos para o Desenvolvimento da Sociedade da Informação (CETIC.br). TIC Domicílios 2022: Pesquisa sobre o uso das tecnologias de informação e comunicação nos domicílios brasileiros [Internet]. São Paulo: Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil; 2023 [citado 2024 Nov 15]. Disponível em: https://cetic.br/pt/publicacao/pesquisa-sobre-o-uso-das-tecnologias-de-informacao-e-comunicacao-nos-domicilios-brasileiros-2022/
Gisondi MA, Barber R, Faust JS, Raja A, Strehlow MC, Westafer LM, et al. A Deadly Infodemic: Social Media and the Power of COVID-19 Misinformation. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(2):e35552. doi: 10.2196/35552.
Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.
Prainsack B. The political economy of digital data: introduction to the special issue. Policy Stud. 2020;41(5):439-446. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2020.1723517.
Mittelstadt BD, Allo P, Taddeo M, Wachter S, Floridi L. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 2016;3(2):1-21. doi: 10.1177/2053951716679679.
O’Connor S. Using social media in nursing education and practice: a bibliometric analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;118:105523. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105523.
Sharon T. When digital health becomes digital medicine, and why it matters. Lancet Digit Health. 2018;1(3):e101-e102. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(18)30121-0.
Figueiredo LC. Heidegger e a questão da ética: o cuidado (Sorge) como ethos originário. Nat Hum. 2003;5(1):155-180. doi: 10.1590/S1517-24302003000100008.
Crossan MM, Apaydin M. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. J Manag Stud. 2010;47(6):1154-1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x.
Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9(2):27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027.
Pariser E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press; 2011.
Cohen IG, Mello MM. HIPAA and Protecting Health Information in the 21st Century. JAMA. 2018;320(3):231–232. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.5630.
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
Lupton D. The quantified self: A sociology of self-tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2016.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Global Academic Nursing Journal