Qualis/CAPES  B4 (2017-2020) Google Scholar   Citations: 927   |   h‑index: 13   |   i10‑index: 25   |   h5‑index: 60   |   h5‑median: 8.5 Impact Factor  SJIF: 3.138 (2021)
Validation and applicability of the Wounds Monitoring software in wound assessment and monitoring
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF

Keywords

Nursing
Validation Study
Validation of Computer Programs
Technology
Wounds

How to Cite

1.
Madril Medeiros R, Neres dos Santos M, Monteiro Moraes V, Kaiser DE, Rosalba Mallmann Duarte Êrica, Viegas K. Validation and applicability of the Wounds Monitoring software in wound assessment and monitoring. Glob Acad Nurs [Internet]. 2022 Sep. 23 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];3(2):e249. Available from: https://globalacademicnursing.com/index.php/globacadnurs/article/view/366

Abstract

The aim was to validate an application software for recording, monitoring and evaluating wounds. Methodological, applied, quantitative study. The references adopted in this project were described in Standard No. 25010 of the International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission. The results were analyzed by a rule proposed by the Brazilian Association of Technical Norms in its Normative No. 14598-6. The feasibility of the system was evaluated through a test of the prototype, with the group of evaluators that was composed of two categories: specialists in information technology and nurses. In the evaluation of the nurses' expertise, the characteristic functional adequacy, reliability, usability, efficiency in performance, compatibility, and safety, obtained 100% of the responses in agreement. Professional IT experts also rated maintainability with 97.3% reliability with 84.9%, usability with 84.6% of the answers in agreement. The software was validated, allowing evaluating the technical quality and functional performance applied to the evaluation and monitoring of wounds.

https://doi.org/10.5935/2675-5602.20200249
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF

References

Gould L, Stuntz M, Giovannelli M, Ahmad A, Aslam R, Mullen-Fortino M, Whitney J, et al. Wound healing society 2015 update on guidelines for pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2016; 24(1):145-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12396

Garbuio DC, Zamarioli CM, Silva NCM, Oliveira-Kumakura ARS, Carvalho EC. Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: an integrative review. Rev Eletr Enf. 2018; 20(1):20-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v20.49425

Moura TB, Santos LSBS, Soares EPB, Silva SSB. Construção de protótipo para sistematização da assistência de enfermagem em uma unidade de cuidados semi-intensivos. Rev Baiana Saúde Pública. 2018; 42.(1):100-10.do doi: https://doi.org/10.22278/2318-2660.2018.v42.n0.a2872

Silva Jr MG, Araújo EC, Moraes CRS, Gonçalves LHT. Software for systematization of nursing care in medical units. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71(5):2425-31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0386

Rezende LCM, Santos SR, Medeiros AL. Assessment of a prototype for the Systemization of Nursing Care on a mobile device. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2016; 24:e2714. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.0898.2714

Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR ISO/ IEC 14598-1:2001: Tecnologia de informação: avaliação de produto de software. Parte 1: visão geral. Rio de Janeiro; 2001.

Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR ISO/ IEC 9126-1:2003. Engenharia de software: qualidade de produto. Parte 1: modelo de qualidade. Rio de Janeiro; 2003.

ISO/IEC 25010 – System and Software engineering - System and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software quality models. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2011.

ISO/IEC 25040 - System and Software engineering - System and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – Evaluation process. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2011.

Oliveira NB, Peres HHC. Evaluation of the functional performance and technical quality of an electronic documentation system of the nursing process. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2015; 23(2):242-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3562.2548

Ghaljaie F, Naderifar M, Goli H. Snowball sampling: a purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2017; 14(3):e67670. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670

Stadler G, Lunardi V, Leal S, Mancia J, Alves P, Viegas K. Sistematização da assistência de enfermagem em unidade de terapia intensiva: implementação de protocolo de banho no leito para pacientes adultos críticos. Enferm Foco. 2020; 10(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2019.v10.n7.2809

Pegoraro LGO, Gvozd R, Haddad MCFL, Vannuchi MTO, Silva LGC, Rossaneis MA. Validation of instrument to assess software of patients’ risk classification. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71(3):975-82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-117-0053

Santo do Espírito SL, Abud ACF, Souza CAS, Torres RC, Lima LS, Santos APA. Algoritmos utilizados para o tratamento de feridas. Rev Enferm Atual Derme. 2019; 90(28). doi: https://doi.org/10.31011/reaid-2019-v.90-n.28-art.523

Kottner J, Cuddigan J, Carville K, Balzer K, Berlowitz, D, Law S, Haesler E. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: the protocol for the second update of the international Clinical Practice Guideline 2019. J Tissue Viabil. 2019; 28(2):51-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2019.01.001

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Global Academic Nursing Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.