Qualis/CAPES  B4 (2017-2020) Google Scholar   Citations: 788   |   h‑index: 12   |   i10‑index: 22   |   h5‑index: 57   |   h5‑median: 8 Impact Factor  SJIF: 3.138 (2021)
Information and Communication Technologies for health education and continuing education in oncology: systematic search protocol
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF

Keywords

Information Technology
Technology
Neoplasms
Professional Training
Health Education

How to Cite

1.
Correa Júnior AJS, Correa NMV, Russo TM da S, Pantoni LA, Souto MMC, Silva CC, Teles AA da S, Sonobe HM. Information and Communication Technologies for health education and continuing education in oncology: systematic search protocol . Glob Acad Nurs [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 9 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];3(Sup.1):e246. Available from: https://globalacademicnursing.com/index.php/globacadnurs/article/view/298

Abstract

The aim is to outline a systematic review protocol on the evidence about the use of information and communication technology for health education in oncology aimed at patients, families and the education of health professionals. This exploratory study describes a six-step integrative review protocol integrated with two other systematic search phases and a final knowledge synthesis phase. We propose: 1) a search in PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, LILACS and Web of Science with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), CINAHL subjects and Health Science Descriptors (DeCS), in addition to alternative terms. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines will be used to check the integrative review report; 2) search for mobile apps on Google Play Store; 3) search for patent registrations at the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI Brasil) and at PatentScope. Each step will have separate collection and descriptive analysis. The discussion and presentation will be mediated by the emergence and systematization of common themes and taking into account health education for the patient-caregiver binomial and continuing education for professionals. The results are expected to summarize the profile and functions of the technologies developed for patients, family members and for the education of health professionals.

https://doi.org/10.5935/2675-5602.20200246
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF

References

Sheikh A, Anderson M, Albala S, Casadei B, Franklin BD, Richards M, et al. Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3(6):e383-e96. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00005-4

Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006; 81(3): 207-12. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002

Farias QLT, Rocha SP, Cavalcante ASP, Diniz JL, Neto OADP, Vasconcelos MIO. Implicações das tecnologias de informação e comunicação no processo de educação permanente em saúde. Reciis Rev Eletron Comun Inf Inov Saúde. 2017; 11(4). DOI: 10.29397/reciis.v11i4.1261

Rouleau G, Gagnon MP, Côté J, Gagnon JP, Hudson E, Dubois CA. Impact of information and communication technologies on nursing care: results of an overview of systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(4): e122. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6686

Vicente C, Amante LN, Santos MJ, Alvarez AG, Salum NC. Cuidado à pessoa com ferida oncológica: educação permanente em enfermagem mediada por tecnologias educacionais. Rev Gaúch Enferm. 2019; 40. DOI: 10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180483

Evans J, Papadopoulos A, Silvers CT, Charness N, Boot WR, Fairchild LS, et al. Remote health monitoring for older adults and those with heart failure: adherence and system usability. Telemed J E Health. 2016; 22(6): 480-8. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0140

Kim JY, Wineinger NE, Steinhubl SR. The influence of wireless self-monitoring program on the relationship between patient activation and health behaviors, medication adherence, and blood pressure levels in hypertensive patients: a substudy of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(6): 116. DOI: doi:10.2196/jmir.5429

Guo Y, Chen Y, Lane DA, Liu L, Wang Y, Lip GYH. Mobile health technology for atrial fibrillation management integrating decision support, education, and patient involvement: mAF App Trial. Am J Med. 2017; 130(12): 1388-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.07.003

Barbosa EMG, Sousa AAS, Vasconcelos MGF, Carvalho REFL, Ória MOB, Rodrigues DP. Tecnologias educativas para promoção do (auto) cuidado de mulheres no pós-parto. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016; 69(3): 582-90. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167.2016690323i

Júnior DNV, Rodrigues VES, Neves IS, Barbosa IHSS, Pereira MKA, Bastos SNMA, Oliveira ASS. Aplicabilidade de tecnologias leve-duras como estratégia para cuidadores de idosos: relato de experiência. Rev Bras Promoç Saúde. 2019; 4:2. DOI: 10.5935/2446-5682.20190020

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Gestão do Trabalho e da Educação na Saúde. Departamento de Gestão da Educação na Saúde. Política Nacional de Educação Permanente em Saúde: o que se tem produzido para o seu fortalecimento?. 1. ed. rev. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2018 [acesso em 9 fev 2022]; 73. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/politica_nacional_educacao_permanente_saude_fortalecimento.pdf

Araújo MML, Pequeno AMC, Guimarães JMX, Filho JOV, Carneiro C, Negreiros FDS, et al. Processo de ensino-aprendizagem de enfermagem: reflexões de docentes sobre o estágio curricular supervisionado. CIAIQ2018. 2018 [acesso em 9 fev 2022]. Disponível em: https://proceedings.ciaiq.org/index.php/ciaiq2018/article/view/1766

Roca J, Reguant M, Canet O. Learning outcomes of “The Oncology Patient” study among nursing students: A comparison of teaching strategies. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;46:29-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.018

Martins LK, Moraes NC, Appel AP, Rodrigues RM, Conterno SFR. Educação em saúde na oncologia: uma revisão integrativa de literatura. Varia Sci. 2016; 2(1): 80-94. DOI: 10.48075/vscs.v2i1.14073

Silva LCA, Signor AC, Pilati ACL, Dalfollo BR, Oliveira DR. Abordagem Educativa ao Paciente Oncológico: Estratégias para Orientação acerca do Tratamento Quimioterápico. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2019; 65(1). DOI: 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2019v65n1.305

Sabino LMM, Brasil DRM, Caetano JA, Santos MCL, Alves MDS. Uso de tecnologia leve-dura nas práticas de enfermagem: análise de conceito. Aquichán. 2016; 16(2): 230-9. DOI: 10.5294/aqui.2016.16.2.10

Queiroz AAFLN, Mendes IAC, Godoy S, Lapão LV, Dias S. mHealth Strategies Related to HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis Knowledge and Access: Systematic Literature Review, Technology Prospecting of Patent Databases, and Systematic Search on App Stores. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021; 9(2): e23912. DOI: 10.2196/23912

Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão Integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & Contexto Enferm. 2008; 17(4): 758-64 [acesso em 9 fev 2022]. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-07072008000400018

Ganong LH. Integrative reviews of nursing research. Res Nurs Health. 1987; 10(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770100103

Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2019.

Tostes MFP., Galvão CM. Processo de implementação da Lista de Verificação de Segurança Cirúrgica: revisão integrativa. Rev Latinoam Enferm (Online). 2019;27:e3104. DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.2921.3104

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan: a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Ursi ES, Gavão CM. Prevenção de lesões de pele no perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura. Rev Latinoam Enferm (Online). 2006;14(1):124-31. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-11692006000100017.

Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Guidelines for critical review form - Quantitative Studies. Adapted Word Version – Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University Occupational Evidence-based Practice Research Group; 1998 [acesso em 9 fev 2022]. Disponível em: http://srs-mcmaster.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Critical-Review-Form-Quantitative-Studies-English.pdf

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Checklists: 10 Questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. 2018 [acesso em 9 fev 2022]. Disponível em: https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018.pdf.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

Lizarondo L, Stern C, Carrier J, Godfrey C, Rieger K, Salmond S. Mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. 2020. DOI: 10.46658/JBIMES-20-09

Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI). Guia simplificado para buscas em bases de patente gratuitas – Módulo 4: Busca no Patentscope. Diretoria de Patentes, Programas de Computador e Topografia de Circuitos Integrados (DIRPA). 115 p.

Medeiros RM, Santos MN, Moraes VM, Duarte ERM, Viegas K. Contribuição de um software para o registro, monitoramento e avaliação de feridas. Glob Acad Nurs. 2021;2(3):e146. DOI: 10.5935/2675-5602.20200146

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Global Academic Nursing Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.